Sandy, again for Inerrancy see the working definition in the print issue of the New York Review of Books piece by Thomas Powers. That's what we are talking about, Inerrancy as defined by Pressler as the takeover rubric not some esoteric in your confused and foggy mind.
Inerrancy as a smokescreen for Pressler's right wing designs.
BTW this fellow probably knows more about that than you do:
http://sociology.rice.edu/Content.aspx?id=78As for my Dad, his view on the Bible was this oft told Rubric: "Some preach it from the Greek, some from the Hebrew; but whether its the Greek, the Hebrew or the Homebrew it's still the Wordagod, Amen!"
Dave is right about the Alamo in 88. I was there with the sticker on the car. I followed Lolley's group that day to the Alamo. I think former FBC Gaffney pastor Johnny McKinney is in the picture taken there that made Ellen Rosenberg's book about the SB's in Transition.
If you want to kinow what happend at SEBTS ask Jim Deloach and Jerry Vines. Vines broke protocol of the Peace committee and had off campus meeting with the Rocky Purvis fellow whose Father Don took Delanna Orien and the WMU to task in 93; and younger Brother Paul was a president of the Furman SGA.
And for fun here is another quote from nybooks: "Adrian Rogers broad political purpose,only half-hidden by the campaign for an inerrant bible, offended and alarmed traditional Baptists..." Great phrase, half hidden by the campaign for the inerrant Bible.
Stay tuned for reminder of what happened in the Missouri synod, a success for right wing politics Pressler had to be aware of. And we cannot forget Moyers pressing questions that caused Pressler to leave the set of the PBS documentary.