by Sandy » Mon Jan 06, 2020 12:43 am
I am opposed to anything being brought into the life of the church that is not directly related to its mission and purpose. I endured several weeks of shrieking and lip flapping when I was the interim at the last SBC church I served in Houston for refusing to allow Eagle Forum to use our fellowship hall without paying the rental fee we required for all outside, non-church related groups. A couple of our ladies were part of the local chapter and they assumed ideological compatibility meant "church related." I said no, it didn't and they would need to fork over the rental money and also agree to our catering rules for their lunch preparation prior to the meeting being put on the schedule.
I would be in disagreement with the practices of many African American churches when it comes to bringing candidates into services and allowing them time to speak to the congregation. Were I a member of a church that did that, I'd object and I feel strongly enough about it that if my objection wasn't at least taken seriously, I'd leave the church and since I see it as an issue of being faithful to the church's mission and Biblical function, I'd most likely leave if the practice wasn't discontinued. Most African American churches I've observed who do this, however, always extend an invitation to all candidates, not just the one they like. In that, they're different than this Evangelical pep rally was. Frankly, the way they went about it was, as far as I am concerned, a declaration of their apostasy.