by Haruo » Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:49 am
Apparently there is a case in Alabama where a pregnant woman started an argument with another woman in a parking lot. The argument escalated, the other woman pulled a gun and shot the first one, not killing her, but killing the unborn child. A grand jury has now decided not to indict the woman who killed the fetus, but to indict the wounded and bereaved woman who started the argument for manslaughter. This has my brain doing weird stuff trying to wrap itself around the jury's reasoning. Does it make more sense somehow (and if so, how?) to those of you nearer ground zero, Keith, Neil, William, Stephen? I was on my way via Google News to try to get a handle on it, when I was waylaid by my desire to investigate Fox's (at that point as far as I could see non-existent) coverage of the Trump Birther Kamala Birther Tweet imbroglio. That's another thread.
Haruo = Leland Bryant Ross
—
—