Re: Global Warming Thread XI
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:24 pm
http://climateprogress.org/2010/12/12/n ... on-record/
of 12 Dec 2010 says this FACT
From Jan to Nov 2010, the average earth surface
temperature offset (difference) from the
1951-1980 baseline was 0.66°C ±0.05°C. The actual
temperature lies between +0.61°C and +0.62°C
1. This is not enough margin of confidence to
say that 2010 was the warmest year (and 2005 the
second warmest year).
2. However, there is no doubt that global warming
is going on.
the ±0.5 in 2010 is because of the pleminary
nature of the NASA report
3. Here are three reasons why the the 2010
figures (+0.66°C±0.05)
should be less than the 2005 figues (+0.62°C±0.01):
A. see the blue streak (1.6 to -1.0) from the
equator mark on the 2010 picture? That is the
start of a La Nina condition (which should cool
most of the world). In 2005 there is an light orange
streak in the East Pacific indication the start of
an El Nino condition (which should warm up
most of the world.
B. England was cooler in 2010 than was it was
in 2005 (sorry, the heat is bases on land
area, not population)
C. the temperature is indistinguishabe if it is one temp
(say 54.0°C) on your feet and 54.66°C on your hands).
An I assure you, nobody can physically experience the
global earth temperature as a person cannot be spread all over
the earth like that. The temperature difference is
discerned by human minds ONLY not by physical bodies.
So it sure makes some one look clueless who looks out
the window and sees a Meter of Snow (39 inches) and
says "where did global warming go". Global Warming
is still here. And the odds favor the statement being true:
"".
of 12 Dec 2010 says this FACT
From Jan to Nov 2010, the average earth surface
temperature offset (difference) from the
1951-1980 baseline was 0.66°C ±0.05°C. The actual
temperature lies between +0.61°C and +0.62°C
1. This is not enough margin of confidence to
say that 2010 was the warmest year (and 2005 the
second warmest year).
2. However, there is no doubt that global warming
is going on.
the ±0.5 in 2010 is because of the pleminary
nature of the NASA report
3. Here are three reasons why the the 2010
figures (+0.66°C±0.05)
should be less than the 2005 figues (+0.62°C±0.01):
A. see the blue streak (1.6 to -1.0) from the
equator mark on the 2010 picture? That is the
start of a La Nina condition (which should cool
most of the world). In 2005 there is an light orange
streak in the East Pacific indication the start of
an El Nino condition (which should warm up
most of the world.
B. England was cooler in 2010 than was it was
in 2005 (sorry, the heat is bases on land
area, not population)
C. the temperature is indistinguishabe if it is one temp
(say 54.0°C) on your feet and 54.66°C on your hands).
An I assure you, nobody can physically experience the
global earth temperature as a person cannot be spread all over
the earth like that. The temperature difference is
discerned by human minds ONLY not by physical bodies.
So it sure makes some one look clueless who looks out
the window and sees a Meter of Snow (39 inches) and
says "where did global warming go". Global Warming
is still here. And the odds favor the statement being true:
"".