by Jim » Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:23 am
DR: It seems strange to me in all this that the State Department and American embassies abroad have always depended on the US Marines for security. That way we gain two things. First, the people doing the guarding are trained professionals, and second, they are under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. There is no chain of command with private mercinary armies. It seems an easy way the Bush Administration has found not to have to send the number of troops needed to do the job and risk greater political fallout in this country. BTW, I would apply the same standard had it been Bill Clinton sending them. It seems to me we are trying now to have a private army as well as a national one. Somewhere this whole issue needs desperately to be addressed because it seems dangerously hard to control and avoids the whole civilian/military chain of command. These people do not seem answerable to anyone ultimately. That is not the American way for which my dad fought in WWII.
J: There’s quite a difference between standing guard at an embassy, a tiny patch in the middle of a city, with, at least supposedly, the backup of the local police, and watching over people working in an overall area the size of California. Private operatives are probably better trained than the traditional soldier. Like Erik Prince, they come from some of the toughest, meanest outfits like the Navy Seals or Green Berets or Army Special Ops. Taking combat troops away from their actual responsibility and assigning them to hundreds of private operations is too unrealistic even to consider. Military units cover their own convoys and other undertakings, but expecting them to guard workers at oil wells and other enterprises is unrealistic, besides the fact that they would operate little differently from those private guards – shoot first and ask questions later. After all, both the private companies and all their employees sign on to jobs they know are hazardous…they pay their money and take their choice. Asking them not to defend themselves is also unrealistic.
Blaming Bush for this situation is predictable, even though so-called “private armies” have been a fact of life for hundreds of years. Bush can stop the whole thing by simply expelling all private companies from Iraq; however, the problem with that is that this country is paying billions in trying to put the place back together, notwithstanding that the Iraqis themselves form the worst impediment to this endeavor. Of course, the whole shooting match is hard to control, but Iraq is not Camelot; rather, it includes small cadres of people intent upon killing each other or anyone who looks other than Arabic. The “mercenary” knows this and has to be tough and unfeeling enough to do whatever’s necessary. They are answerable, however, otherwise they wouldn’t be under investigation. Congressional committees are literally licking their chops at yet another opportunity to tag the administration for the murderous outfit they claim it is.
General Patton of WWII fame had it about right. The battle plans are perfect…until the first shot is fired, and than all bets are off. The same is true with the private sector. The whole thing is messy. Why wouldn’t it be?