Personal preference aside, whenever I hear that something was on Fox News of any importance, I look up the fact checkers who for the most part tend to lean conservative. Fox News never gets the facts straight. If a Fox news report said grass is green, I'd have to go outside and make sure. That's how bad they are.
The Times is the most reputable news source in the world. To date, when it is cited and someone here criticizes it because it is the New York Times, no evidence to counter their accuracy has ever been offered, just vague, nebulous opinion. Apparently, it's readership gives it tremendous credibility. 130 million readers, and growing exponentially during the Trump era.
For a long time, you could read the Times online for free. But the printed newspaper business is shrinking and revenue from print ads is dropping everywhere. The Times, along with the Washington Post, have transitioned to being electronic newsrooms with more circulation than a paper could give them, but now you have to subscribe to read the content. I think the "first click free" policy is passing on. I live in a 55+ senior high rise now, so I go out on the balcony in the morning with my coffee and "read the paper" on my laptop. I subscribe to the Times, the Post, and the Arizona Daily Star. MSNBC I watch by podcast on my phone.
I still get my newspaper fix thumbing through an actual paper, which I enjoy, by ordering my hometown newspaper via print copy through the mail. It is a weekly, so it doesn't really matter that it is a week old when it arrives. And I get the print copy of the Chicago Tribune on Sunday.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-y ... 2019-02-06https://www.businessinsider.com/the-new ... rs-2017-12