[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4688: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3823)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4690: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3823)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4691: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3823)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4692: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3823)
BaptistLife.Com Forums. • View topic - Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ reflects

Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ reflects

Discuss current news and trends taking place in the Southern Baptist Convention.

Moderator: William Thornton

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Tim Bonney » Thu Aug 03, 2017 9:53 am

It is interesting your conversations about keeping membership stats.

Years ago the amount Methodist churches paid to the denomination (apportionment) was based on your active membership. So churches were quick to remove people from the rolls who didn't attend for several years. Now it is based on income so now membership has no effect. So now, like I experienced in Baptist churches, the local church is reluctant to remove members from the roll for fear of hurting feelings, etc.

My estimate over the years has been that many church's membership is inflated anywhere from 1/4th to a 1/3rd of the real actual participants in the church. That is anecdotal I know. But I think it likely that most church membership stats are inflated somewhat and that our actual decline as denominations is larger than most people would be willing to admit.
Tim Bonney

First UMC of Indianola, Iowa - http://indfumc.org
User avatar
Tim Bonney
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6571
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:17 am
Location: Indianola, Iowa

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby William Thornton » Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:29 pm

Generally, SBC church membership stats are comparable over the years. I would guess that there has been some trend over the decades in how churches came up with these numbers but from one year to the next I think they can be used to make a comparison. I don't see any sbc leaders blaming losses in membership to changing the way churches report data.

My three churches were all membership heavy but not absurdly so.
My stray thoughts on SBC stuff may be found at my blog,
User avatar
William Thornton
Site Admin
 
Posts: 12613
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Tim Bonney » Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:27 pm

Tim Bonney

First UMC of Indianola, Iowa - http://indfumc.org
User avatar
Tim Bonney
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6571
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:17 am
Location: Indianola, Iowa

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby JE Pettibone » Thu Aug 03, 2017 5:17 pm

JE Pettibone
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:48 am

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Sandy » Thu Aug 03, 2017 5:35 pm

Lifeway used to play a big role in keeping track of the SBC membership stats, especially related to Sunday School.

The discrepancy in membership in the SBC must be pretty big in many churches. The reported total membership has fallen to just north of 15 million, which reflects a loss of about a million over the course of a decade. The average weekly worship attendance has dropped by more than half a million during the same time. But there's a wide variance between the membership of 15 million, and the average attendance, now just a bit south of 5 million. And the way Southern Baptists do church membership, that means 10 million people who were baptized by immersion, not as infants, have made a decision somewhere along the line not to attend an SBC church. Probably a lot of those have gone to non-denominational churches that don't track or transfer membership, and some of those are most likely dead. But that's still a large figure of inactive membership.
Sandy
 

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Tim Bonney » Fri Aug 04, 2017 10:42 am

Tim Bonney

First UMC of Indianola, Iowa - http://indfumc.org
User avatar
Tim Bonney
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6571
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:17 am
Location: Indianola, Iowa

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Sandy » Fri Aug 04, 2017 12:48 pm

Sandy
 

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Tim Bonney » Fri Aug 04, 2017 10:00 pm

Tim Bonney

First UMC of Indianola, Iowa - http://indfumc.org
User avatar
Tim Bonney
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6571
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:17 am
Location: Indianola, Iowa

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Tim Bonney » Fri Aug 04, 2017 10:10 pm

Sandy, to another part of your question, I don’t think any more Methodists are out of touch with their local church than any other denomination I’ve been a part of in recent decades. The average church attender still attends but less frequently than they used to. From what I read now regular attendance to a lot of people means a couple of times a month rather than the every week attendance you and I grew up with.
Tim Bonney

First UMC of Indianola, Iowa - http://indfumc.org
User avatar
Tim Bonney
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6571
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:17 am
Location: Indianola, Iowa

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby linda » Sun Aug 27, 2017 4:59 pm

I have no clue how Calvinism is affecting the SBC. But I do know the local church has 3 less attending/members because of it:) Our local choice was hyper Cal and/or hyper Cal hyper fundy YEC. We loved the UMC services but being conservative, don't attend there. Local church here is more conservative than the whole denom, but we found more to our liking the Church of the Nazarene. And yet our church, we are told, lost members years ago when the CotN decided dispensational teaching was not in accord with Wesleyanism. Local church is still, however, a blend of those theologies. Sort of dispy/Arminian.

So I guess theological change does sometimes result in folks leaving a given body.

My question: do ya'll for see a coming split in the SBC into two conventions, modified Arminian and Calvinist?
Linda
linda
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:53 pm

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Haruo » Mon Aug 28, 2017 1:40 am

Haruo = Leland Bryant Ross

User avatar
Haruo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 13131
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:21 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Sandy » Mon Aug 28, 2017 5:39 pm

Sandy
 

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Rvaughn » Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:01 pm

Last edited by Rvaughn on Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rvaughn
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:54 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby William Thornton » Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:22 am

My stray thoughts on SBC stuff may be found at my blog,
User avatar
William Thornton
Site Admin
 
Posts: 12613
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Haruo » Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:56 am

Is "Traditionalist" preferred by both sides as an antonym to "Calvinist", or is it only the Traditionalists that like to be called that? I remember a number of other cases in both secular and religious/SBC politics where there has been a lack of consensus over whether to call it, say, the Conservative Resurgence or the Fundy Takeover. Whether to say "alt-right" or "virulently racist". That sort of thing.
Haruo = Leland Bryant Ross

User avatar
Haruo
Site Admin
 
Posts: 13131
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:21 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Rvaughn » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:28 pm

I'd say that mainly the Traditionalist prefer it. Many "non-Traditionalists" point out that Calvinism has a long standing "tradition" in the SBC and was once (maybe not in its strictest form) the majority position. Here's a read from one traditionalist about the term.
User avatar
Rvaughn
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:54 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Dave Roberts » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:34 pm

"God will never be less than He is and does not need to be more" (John Koessler)

My blog: http://emporiadave.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Dave Roberts
Site Admin
 
Posts: 7714
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:01 pm
Location: Southside, VA

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby Sandy » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:53 am

The "lessening of denominational loyalty" that Dave mentions is visible in convention attendance. The core group that attends conventions and makes denominational decisions is down to a tenth of what it was at the peak of the controversy. Registration runs under 6,000. I don't really see a lot of interest anymore in the names on the who's who list at Ninth and Commerce in Nashville. I've worked with several of the local pastors up here, and their primary interest in the SBC is its mission support. The focus of most of the churches here is evangelism and ministry to build churches. I doubt they'd be interested in a denominational fight over doctrine. David Platt and Russell Moore would be the two denominational leaders who have the most name recognition and admiration among the SBC leaders in Pennsylvania, both Calvinists, and Mark Dever is also well known and highly respected because of his Nine Marks group and emphasis on revitalizing churches, and because he'll come here for conferences and consults and doesn't charge an arm and leg to do it.

I also see that there isn't really much of an effort to keep Calvinists out. You've got Platt and Moore, who are probably the most liked, most popular denominational leaders especially among younger pastors. And the Calvinists don't seem to be knocking the door down, demanding to be included. Dever, for example, has his own ministry group that serves the needs of a lot of SBC churches, and crosses outside denominational lines. They network with like-minded people, and meet needs that the denomination doesn't, so there's really not a need to abandon support for missions. And I really don't think the Calvinists are interested in running the SBC.
Sandy
 

Re: Veteran of Southern Baptist Calvinist ‘reformation’ refl

Postby JE Pettibone » Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:30 am

JE Pettibone
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:48 am

Previous

Return to SBC News and Trends

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 16 guests

cron