Neither of you are paying attention. First of all, there is evidence, a mountain of it, that establishes Russian interference. Google and get the hearing notes. There are pages and pages of it. Second, there is evidence connecting specific Trump campaign officials to the Russian intelligence agency, and other Russian sources of interference directly. Google the hearing notes. There are at least five campaign officials who have been identified, and issued subpoenas, and two that have asked for immunity, and one for whom Trump obstructed justice to ask the FBI to back off. I'd suggest that you plan some time, sit down in front of your screen, and go through about two weeks worth of Greta VanSustern, Chris Matthews, Chris Hayes and Rachel Maddow. They've laid it all out, more or less chronologically, and unless you can come up with something of substance that indicates their facts are incorrect, they're credible references on this subject. I've made that statement before, and have yet to see any challenge to their reporting. Third, there is no evidence that has been presented publicly which mentions Trump as being directly involved, though that is incidental to the issue if his campaign was involved. Coats' refusal to answer questions in the hearing yesterday directly related to Trump's involvement is a legitimate clue as to what might be coming down the pike.
If there's nothing there, then why is the Trump White House going to all of this extended activity to try to undermine Comey, and get out in front of the testimony today? Why not just put the records of the conversations between the five campaign officials and the Russians they were involved with multiple times prior to the election out on the table so everyone can see it? None of the intelligence chiefs say that there is no evidence? That's not true. The two on the stand yesterday simply refused to testify, claiming that the evidence they have is "classified."
Then there's the former intelligence chief Clapper. Video in the link here.
http://globalnews.ca/news/3509198/trump ... committee/It seems pretty obvious that there are multiple means by which the Republicans, who are in control of all of this, could easily shut it down and make it go away. If there were no evidence, and nothing to it, they'd have done it a long time ago. It's pointless to discuss this with his supporters, who mindlessly shut out any credible source of information and think that this will all just go away because it's not real and it didn't happen.