by Cathy » Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:14 am
I'm sorry for my mistakes in my reply to my own post. I actually asked to have it removed so I could go back and fix it. I couldn't figure out how to delete it myself. I did indeed mean Truett but I guess because of the source of my original google search I had the other name on my mind. No Truett is not Criswell and given the home in which I was raised and the city I spent most of my adult life I am aware of that. I have now edited that. But really, isn't all that discussion of my errors dull and kind of old fashion nitpicking. I am often multitasking and should pay a bit more attention. I have had my punishment and I will try to do better. The amount of time trying to decipher my comments instead of going to the link and commenting makes me wonder what you all are thinking. I only put in the (too quick) reply to my own post because the link went unnoticed.
My illusion to the divides were...
SBC and CBF,
Truett and SWBTS,
Arminians and Calvinists,
the Trinity as doctrine vs a construct of our faith (and that is probably a poor statement of the mini divide, I'm no theologian)
"inerrancy" and refusing to accept the word inerrancy,
I believe a careful listen will reveal that Patterson mentions Yarnell's name when he acknowledges him before the Trinity question is asked. Patterson introduces his pastor followed by a bit of joking and then his pastor asks the inerrancy question (this is very near the end). However someone may have entered the discussion and Dr. Olson may be referring to him.
John, I have no memory of my posting on Calvinism. I'll have to look it up. I am not a Calvinist. While I enjoyed Dr. Olson's discussion It was not my intent to post a mostly calvinist vs arminian discussion but to highlight a pleasant exchange between the two baptist seminaries in Texas. The content of the discussion is however interesting to me and surprisingly enjoyable.
Last edited by
Cathy on Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:55 am, edited 2 times in total.