http://www.albertmohler.com/2015/05/18/ ... -wacker-2/Mohler tells Wacker Graham much more involved in the fundy takeover of the SBC than Wacker coulda imagined, nor reported.
Graham shyed away from entanglements over inerrancy. Didn't seem to phase Mohler though Mohler's whole career stands on inerrancy, though Mohler says its not the whole story
Mohler says in 93 Graham told him Mohler; Graham made it clear that he expected Moher to stand for inerrancy . And Mohler mentions in 84 and 87 Graham took the fundy side in the SBC takeover. Wacker begs off the significance. Wacker said he never consciously dissimulated.
Wacker says Graham was conservative but didn't want to break fellowship. I think WAcker is naïve. Mohler also pushes the question and suggests Graham more calculating.
Mohler pushes to document entrepreneur and architect. Mohler promotes Carl Henry