Strict Constructionist hypocrisy

[Sandy]

Arizona's new immigration law, now challenged in the court by a lawsuit filed by the federal government, is a violation of the constitution, which gives all authority over immigration issues to the federal government.

It's been interesting to see the flip floping of conservative politicians, and the absolute hypocrisy of the radio deejay-turned-political pundits and their followers. These people are strict constructionists when it suits them, but they're cheerleading the Arizona law which is a clear violation of the constitution. Wanna take bets on what their reaction will be if the courts "legislate from the bench" and rule in their favor?

[Dave Roberts]

Years ago, I had a professor tell me that we are all a bit like the old mules that wore blinders. He said that the purpose of education is not to remove your blinders but to help you recognize that they are there. Both sides seem to refuse to recognize they are wearing them in this issue.

[Howard V]

Just a question. How is the AZ law controlling immigration? It seems only to seek to enforce federal immigration laws. If you are here and you have not followed the law getting here you ought to go. Does not seem too complicated to me. Just my opinion.

Howard

[Chris]

[Sandy]

The issue isn't whether or not Arizona can enforce federal immigration law, which it not only can, but which it is obligated to do. The issue is whether or not passing a law to define a specific aspect of federal law is constitutional. It isn't. So if a judge rules in the case in favor of the Arizona law, conservatives who claim to be strict constructionists will be hypocrites supporting legislating from the bench.

[Chris]

Thanks for the explanation, Sandy. I get it now.

[Howard V]

So, regardless of what the judge rules, AZ can go right ahead and do what their law says because they are required to do it any how? Is that right? Then why the federal law court case? I'm not sure I get it.

Howard

[Dave Roberts]

Congress is supposed to write immigration law. The problem is that immigration law reform, regardless of how it comes out, is likely to cost some congressmen their jobs. Therefore, for the good of their own positions, they just don't get around to doing it. They all understand that this is the name of the game.

[Chris]