And he names the Splinters
http://sbcvoices.com/splintered-can-any ... f-the-sbc/
One he does not name is the distance between him and David Rogers, Ginny Brant and Howell Scott.
I think those three have a better heart than Miller. Brant for one says good things about Buck Hatch, the father of the President of Wake Forest University. Her views on the politics of abortion don't appear to me to be much different than those of David Gushee.
I am convinced David Rogers is not the fundamentalist his Father was, though he still shows great allegiance and adoration to the Memory of his father, as most sons do.
Howell Scott, wrong on many things and nearsighted when it comes to the secular political inclinations and allignments of the SBC, is much more civil, honest evaluator of the esoterics of the public square and the denomination than Miller.
And Ginny Brant and Anne Graham Lotz seem to be closer to CBF on Women in Ministry; pulpit female preachers, than Miller and his band of bog laden hardliners and exclusivists.
How it will remorph itself who is to say, but when it does Miller will be there to catalog it all. In categories of of SBC, he is almost as good as Charles Darwin on speciation.