Dismiss the Christian Right at Your Own Risk
What Blumenthal has captured in chilling reportage is the reality that the Republican Party has been “shattered” by a sociopolitical movement that has raised political partisanship to the level of a cosmological struggle. Emilio Gentile, a political scientist in Italy, refers to this as the “sacralization of politics.” Not participation in political struggles by the religious, but the elevation of politics to the level of the sacred. For most in the Christian Right, if you are not working with God, then you are a witting or unwitting purveyor of ungodly sin. For the most apocalyptically-aroused participants in the Christian Right’s new political crusades, this involves the struggle against Satan in the End Times.
If you think that references to the Crusades are far fetched, consider that at the Christian Right’s 2009 Values Voter Summit in Washington DC, the exhibit hall had a table from the ultra-right Catholic group Tradition, Family, Property (TFP) for whom the Crusades and Inquisition were high points of Christian devotion. One earnest young man wore the ceremonial blood-red sash favored by TFP, recalling the red flags that accompanied Torquemada into a Spanish town and which preceded the condemned heading toward the flames at the stake. Not my brand of Christianity, thanks.
The Christian Right and its allies peddle a form of apocalyptic aggression that can be embraced by those anticipating Armageddon, those fighting corrosive sinful society, and secularists with a highly dualistic worldview. As sociologist Brenda E. Brasher has observed, in political struggles, dualistic apocalypticism “leaves no room for ambiguity in the stories told about the ‘Other.’ There is a real hardening of sides. We are good, they are evil. This is not a disagreement, but a struggle with evil incarnate, so there is no structure for a peaceful reconciliation.” The stories surfacing in the angry teabagger, townhaller, and birther movements reflect this aggressive apocalyptic dualism in both religious and secular forms.
Of Max's new book at
http://www.religiondispatches.org/archi ... op/?page=2I encourage Gourley and AAron Weaver to use Parham's recent column on Lindsay Graham and Land as takeoff for thorough review of this book using this RD column as source.
Interview David Rogers and Harry Dent's daughter Ginny Brant, Sen Graham's Neighbor in Seneca South Carolina to give the Baptists Today article "Sparkle".
I'm just a phone call away for suggestions and insight
And do listen closely to the NPR Here and Now interview few days ago to give you focus in this pursuit.
Talk to Charles marsh about how Francis Schaeffer missed the boat on inerrancy in early 70's Lausanne Conference. a mistake Max reports Francis the Dad regretted toward the end of his life; the political entanglements it led to.