BaptistLife.Com Forums.

In the Gospel of John 2: 13-17, Jesus throws out the money changers at the beginning of His ministry. In Matthew (21:12-13); Mark (11: 15-19); Luke (19: 45-48), Jesus throws out the money changers at the end of His ministry (soon after entrance into Jerusalem). Since the Gospel of John was written long after the other three, I attribute this to John having a bad memory. Today, a member of my church, who visited a Pentecostal church, Saturday night, told me that the preacher he heard taught them that Jesus cleansed the Temple twice. I'd like to get the opinions of member of this forum. Personally, I think that if Jesus had thrown out the moneychangers in 30 A.D.; and they saw Him walk in in 33 A.D., they would have scattered before giving Him the opportunity to humiliate them again.

I believe that the Fourth Gospel has a theological purpose for placing the cleansing at the first of Jesus' ministry rather than at the more likely position of the synoptics. Theologically, the writer places it at the beginning to show that the entire ministry of Jesus is ultimately a passion narrative. Gospel writers are not biographers, in the modern sense, but are writing to reflect a theological purpose. That's the reason I would give for such an explanation.

The question that is still unanswered: Did Jesus do this once or twice?

0 times, 1 time, 2 times. many times, it's entirely unclear. And not important. The event (and its place in the overall narrative) has symbolic significance. But it's not history. It's like asking, why keep the Sabbath? Is it because God rested on the seventh day (go thou therefore and do likewise)? Or is it because our ancestors were slaves in Egypt?

There can be little doubt that Jesus “cleansed” the temple at least twice, the documented occurrences about three years apart. The first occasion (John account) came on the heels of the performing of his first miracle at Cana, after which he and followers went to Capernaum for a few days, according to the scripture/time-line (27 A.D.), and then to Jerusalem, where John made certain to record the fact that Jesus fashioned the lash himself and used it extensively, a violent act. He and followers then left the city and carried out his ministry throughout the countryside. The second recorded occurrence came during the last week of his earthly life (30 A.D., Matthew, Mark), though the whip was not mentioned, just that Jesus threw the scoundrels out into the street. He didn't need the whip then because at least some of the gang surely knew about the first time and probably gave no resistance. The Bible is very clear on this. Jesus was no wimp and was obviously capable of both physical and verbal violence, once even referring to Peter as Satan and the church oligarchs as stinking tombs full of dead men's bones. This reflects the justifiable wrath of God as referenced over and over in the OT. While the scripture records at least once that Jesus wept, it does not mention that he ever laughed, though he probably did heartily at times, such as when Peter started sinking on his trek over water. He also told the disciples at the Last Supper to arm themselves and explained later that the weapons were for defense, not aggression. The mod/lib approach is that Jesus was a warm-fuzzy, hugs-all-around type, who would never harm a flea, not even for cause, like sanitation. He was a man's man hunted throughout his ministry and probably only one step ahead of assassination for most if not all of it.

I would stick to one.

True, but sometimes the reasons for things are lost like the psalm tunes in the mists of time. I'm not saying it's likely, just that we don't know and as far as I know don't need to know.

That Christ cleaned the Temple should not be up for debate - but then bl.com is a place built on debate.

Why Jesus cleansed the Temple is what we really need to discover.

I am in for 1 and it was on the Monday of Holy Week.

There is a great lesson in the daily events recorded during Holy Week built upon the previous days' event.