by William Thornton » Wed Jul 16, 2014 5:11 am
This is one of those bizzare conversations with Ed that have always flummoxed me. I'm not sure why on a generic subject like friendliness in churches Ed takes a combative posture...but I'll try to be patient and explain things.
My comment to Dave has a longer story so I'll leave it for later.
On my (and my wife's) perception that churches we visited were unfriendly, I don't mind being quizzed by a colleague on how this unfriendliness was expressed but at base, I'd say to Ed or anyone that it is not allowable to argue with someone about their feelings and impressions. If a person visited my church and found it to be unfriendly, it would be improper to argue with them that they were wrong about that. If one wants honest feedback then one has to accept what is offered and try and learn from that starting point.
As to exactly how I came to the conclusion that churches I visited were unfriendly, here are a few specifics. These are pretty standard.
1. No one other than the pastor or a staff member introduced themselves to us before or after the service.
2. We were only greeted during the canned greeting time in the service.
3. We arrived early and members who came in later chose to sit some distance from us. It was comical in one church. No one sat in the pew in front of us, behind us, and only on the opposite end of the pew we were on.
4. Suspicious looks.
My view is that churches are not deliberately unfriendly and don't see themselves as such but are oblivious to how they are perceived by guests. Most SBC churches around here think they are friendly are would be offended to be told otherwise. It just takes some deliberate and purposeful actions by members of the congregation to be considered friendly.
Learn something here, Ed, and get the chip off your shoulder.
My stray thoughts on SBC stuff may be found at my blog,