Hmm, that's interesting. Roosevelt, JFK-Johnson, and Clinton all raised the corporate tax rates to compensate for the cost that big business takes out of the economy in infrastructure, and returns in benefits, and the economy produced record growth under their economic policies. Eisenhower, Nixon-Ford, Reagan-Bush and Bush II all lowered the corporate tax rate, reducing goverment revenue significantly, and the economic hallmarks of their administrations were recessions accompanied by rising energy costs that zapped private spending. Obama wants to do more of the same stuff Kennedy and Clinton did? Well, given that they both presided over the greatest economic growth in American history, I'd say he's on the right track. Stabilizing government revenue is one thing, but the Bush tax cuts, which are directly responsible for the worst recession since the great depression, kicked over the cow. It would be like me buying a big house, an expensive car, and running up a lot of credit card debt and then expecting everyone else on this board to pay the tab. Big business runs up a big bill in infrastructure and defense protection, and then expects the private citizens to pay for it. The government has picked up most of the tab for retirement and medical benefits for retirees and pensioniers that corporations should have picked up when those people were working for them. But with corporate tax rates at half or less what they were during the most roaring economic growth, the bill zaps the life out of the economy.
Obama is on the right track.