by KeithE » Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:05 am
The article that ET added from 911debunkers is what I mean when I said, these sites very often do not even deal with the points the truthers make at all. They dream up argumnets to refute. For instance, both Steve Jones' and Nels Harrit's independently-performed chem analysis found red and gray specks (indicative of a certain nano-thermite high explosive) not yellow residue which is indicative of sulfur as ET's article mis-focusses on. They battle some imaginary foe and the onlooking sheep, whose mind jumps at any argument supported their apriori veiwpoints, say that just "common sense".
Much more to say that will have to wait until tonight (including angle cuts - also not brought up by either Jones' or Harrit's chem anlysis papers, but has been brought up by other truthers). But if you have time, please read the two articles thoroughly - one being of work in this area and the other being that comes from 911debunkers that ET provided).
Last edited by
KeithE on Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Informed by Data.
Driven by the SPIRIT and JESUS’s Example.
Promoting the Kingdom of GOD on Earth.