by Blake » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:01 pm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-gold ... 28329.htmlI liked several of the points made in this Huffington Post opinion. I do think the ruling is worrisome and I do think many other college campuses will use the ruling as a pretext to get Christian ministry groups off their campuses. These very arguments have been used against multiple InterVarsity groups across the country already. I also wish the courts would recognize that membership in these Christian ministry organizations is often very different from membership in other organizations. Usually membership means everyone that attends events, but for campus ministries it only ever means the leaders are on the roster because everyone is always welcome to attend events no matter their sexual orientation, religion, politics, etc.
Membership to any organization on a college campus implies two things: a common goal and a common starting point. Most people don't realize how important the second factor is. By the current ruling of SCOTUS I should be able to join a football club fulling intending the goal of playing football, but should be able to sue the club if my starting point is practicing football by playing baseball. Should undergrads be able to sue grad level organizations because their academic status doesn't qualify them for membership? An undergrad can have the same passion and desire to do for biology what the grad does, but their starting point disqualifies their ability to interact on the same level.
"But for our parts, to take a carnal weapon in our hands, or use the least violence, either to support or pull down the worst, or to set up or maintain the best of men, we look not upon it to be our duty in the least..."
- Henry Adis