BaptistLife.Com Forums.

Wisconsin-based atheist group sues Trump over church order

What a lot of men don't seem to know or understand is that a LOT of women who take birth control pills are using them to control heavy extremely painful and unpredictable monthly periods. If a woman works outside the home, and has to call in sick several days out of the month, it costs her employer lost time, and lost wages for the employee. It is an advantage to an employer to cover whatever prescription medications an employee needs. I wonder if Hobby Lobby covers the cost of Viagra? I would consider that more of a recreational pharmaceutical than a medical necessity

This from the President who went to extremes to criticize President Obama for legislating by executive order, and from the party who basically tried to say that it was a question of legitimacy and a sign of an inability to work with Congress. The buffoon has set the record, in a short amount of time, for doing everything he swore he would not do.

What kind of "harm" are you talking about?

The legal principle that is being used involves the "least restrictive" imposition on religious liberty. Keith, naturally, has his own principles of religious liberty which involves "teeny weeny" costs and declares that principled religious objectors are "grandstanding" and should accommodate themselves to violating their religious views. Thank God and sober judges that more serious considerations are given to such things.

It's a complex matter.

Yes, let's argue with the most absurd examples we can find.

Sandy and Bingo notwithstanding, thank God for judges who take the first amendment seriously. It is complex.

I was referring to Sandy's ketchup.

It's clear cut to you and clear cut to the objectors.