Page 1 of 2
Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Fri May 05, 2017 4:18 pm
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Fri May 05, 2017 4:37 pm
by Rvaughn
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Sat May 06, 2017 2:43 pm
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Sat May 06, 2017 4:42 pm
by Rvaughn
Wisconsin-based atheist group sues Trump over church order
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Sat May 06, 2017 4:57 pm
by Rvaughn
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Sun May 07, 2017 6:39 am
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Sun May 07, 2017 7:22 am
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 12:48 pm
by Mrs Haruo
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 2:32 pm
by Sandy
This from the President who went to extremes to criticize President Obama for legislating by executive order, and from the party who basically tried to say that it was a question of legitimacy and a sign of an inability to work with Congress. The buffoon has set the record, in a short amount of time, for doing everything he swore he would not do.
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 5:27 pm
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 5:47 pm
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 8:34 pm
by Rvaughn
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 8:53 pm
by Rvaughn
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 9:26 pm
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 9:47 pm
by Rvaughn
What kind of "harm" are you talking about?
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Mon May 08, 2017 10:36 pm
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 5:07 am
by William Thornton
The legal principle that is being used involves the "least restrictive" imposition on religious liberty. Keith, naturally, has his own principles of religious liberty which involves "teeny weeny" costs and declares that principled religious objectors are "grandstanding" and should accommodate themselves to violating their religious views. Thank God and sober judges that more serious considerations are given to such things.
It's a complex matter.
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 8:01 am
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 8:04 am
by Sandy
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 8:48 am
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 8:52 am
by William Thornton
Yes, let's argue with the most absurd examples we can find.
Sandy and Bingo notwithstanding, thank God for judges who take the first amendment seriously. It is complex.
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 8:55 am
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 9:08 am
by KeithE
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 9:14 am
by William Thornton
I was referring to Sandy's ketchup.
It's clear cut to you and clear cut to the objectors.
Re: Religious Liberty Exec Order
Posted:
Tue May 09, 2017 9:31 am
by KeithE