by Tim Bonney » Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:24 pm
Keith, good analysis of the origins of inerrancy. But I'm not sure why you conclude that "truth without mixture of error"="inerrancy" when a large portion of Southern Baptists never took it that way? If all Southern Baptists believed that "truth without mixture of error" meant inerrancy there never would have been the SBC fight over the term.