by William Thornton » Fri Apr 03, 2015 8:07 pm
People assert their RF rights all the time. There's a body of case law on it. The new wrinkle is the sea change on gay marriage and how this will be managed. Different states have different laws. The objections recently are partly hysterical, partly genuine in that extending RFRA to all manner of businesses is new, post Hobby lobby.
We're in for some years of litigation, I think.
Social cons got waxed this week. We will see where this goes.
Brent Walker, BJCPA, says everyone should chill. Not bad advice.
Neither Keith nor timothy demonstrate much understanding of first amendment religious liberty issues. Timothy is excused because he's a Methodist these days. Even lib Baptists should have a firm grasp of this. Perhaps the problem is that this cannot be graphed and made visual for K.
When I get a chance, I'll link Walker and Aaron Weaver who has a good piece on this.
My stray thoughts on SBC stuff may be found at my blog,