Deregulated Capitalism vs Global Warming

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

Limbaugh has been saying this for years, that the GW movement is a vehicle for anti-capitalism.

[KeithE]

[Dave Roberts]

[KeithE]

The stranglehold is being tightened. Please read: and write to your congressmen/women (there might be a few honest ones left), bring up in your associations, take to the streets (if you are so inclined), and/or take to your blogs (if you are so inclined, like me).

[ET]

[William Thornton]

Tour de force, ET.

Keith, try sticking with graphs. You are lost in space on this one.n

[David Flick]

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

The problem, Keith, is not that we have failed to read the authority du jour on economics but that you characteristically revert to conjecture, snarl terminology, and heavy assumptions.

And Keith, we are all "non-fundamentalists" here comrade. You will not be able to name a single true fundie (or unfettered capitalist) among us.

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

I never argue GW.

You referred to fundamentalists. I presumed you meant religious Fundies. There are none here, neither are there any unfettered free marketeers. That deprives you of considerable bases for your moralizing. But venting and lecturing is standard fare here. Let 'er rip.

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

Since you regularly mix tendentious language, unwarranted assumptions, and unsupported conclusions, think it valid to call such venting, moralizing, and lecturing.

We are all followers of Christ. We share many of the same goals in public policy. We differ on causes and effects. This difference does not cause me to consider you less of a Christian or failing in exemplary Christian behavior. Your posts regularly cause me to think, perhaps with unwarranted assumptions, that you do not think the same about us, or about any who have a greater belief in free markets as a tool to enable poverty to be reduced or wealth to be increased.

You need to meet a few genuine fundies. Inerrantists are a very broad group. But if you find your assumptions to be useful here, go ahead and show yourself to be uninformed.

[KeithE]

[Ed Pettibone]

Ed" Keith when you say " In my definition, if you believe in inerrancy, you are a religious fundamentalist - just being descriptive not pejorative."

It sounds a lot like AR's pickles, souls and the SBC statement. Inerrancy is but one element of fundamentalism.

[KeithE]

[ET]

self -

[Ed Pettibone]

[KeithE]