Our Moderate/Liberal/Marxist/Socialist friends here

[KeithE]

[Sandy]

[Dave Roberts]

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

Keith said: "But they (and you) do say the government should not be involved in helping the poor."

The "you" is ET, not me, but I would like for you to show either of us where we have stated the above.

[ET]

I've addressed the multiple misrepresentations Keith makes above in other posts in the past. I won't take the time to do it again. You really can't do much for someone who implies that if gov'ment weren't around, we wouldn't have any roads.

I do get rather amused at Keith and his use of roads as one of the great "values" we receive from government. The government built the interstate highway system, which we Americans proceeded to use. Now some 50 years later, Keith and his buddies don't like we're using those roads so much and want to take us back 200 years and cram us all on trains to get places.

[KeithE]

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

[KeithE]

[Sandy]

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

Sorry, won't work. Start with this one: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=10309&p=139846&hilit=guns#p139842

We already have gummit heavily involved in progressive taxation, wealth transfer, alleviation of poverty, food stamps, etc. the salient question must be this: William, ET, should all these be eliminated? Is gummit doing such a great job that we should expand these and solve al our problems?

[William Thornton]

It looks to me like mod/libs here wish a single payer, Medicare for all type of health care. Can we get a graph of Medicare costa and deficits, please?

[Sandy]

[Dave Roberts]

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

[KeithE]

[William Thornton]

I love an optimist.

[Sandy]

[ET]

[Haruo]

[ET]

[ET]