Hockey Stick Confirmed Yet Again

[KeithE]

[ET]

[KeithE]

[ET]

[Sandy]

Facts are facts. And if they don't support a right wing view, right wingers will make them up, along with claiming the sources say something that they never did.

[KeithE]

[David Flick]

[KeithE]

[David Flick]

[Sandy]

[David Flick]

[ET]

Charts, charts and more charts!!! ---

Looks like this guy has a fascination with charts like Keith.

I recommend scrolling down to "Climate models can't predict squat". Also read the "extreme weather" news articles from '56, '57 and '58 that, had they occurred in the last decade, would almost certainly not be reported without a claim that they are due to global warming.

Since this is directly related to Keith's original post, I think I may take closer look into . Even breaks it down into "how to construct the 'handle' of the hockey stick" and "how to construct the blade".

Also note the article about fracking, one of the things that gets environmental wackos riled up these days. The primary article is from slate.com, not exactly a "extremist right wing media" source:
Note: Bjorn Lomberg is a well-known global warming proponent, but unlike many others, he's far more rational in how to address things.

Much irony in this issue in that while domestic product on PRIVATE land has exploded and is responsible for this, Obama takes credit for it while signing laws to restrict exploration on PUBLIC lands. What could be more hypocritical than that?

[ET]