by William Thornton » Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:33 pm
Fast food workers, that would be the taco stuffers who work for big bidness (more than 30 locations) get the big raise in some locales. Others do not. Typical and arbitrary gummit selection of winners and losers.
But, why begrudge a hardworking, low skill McD employee? Maybe the teen, the summer job crowd, the extra income worker should have such pay. I'm curious, though, about unintended consequences.
Chick-fil-A has motivated, happy workers at the rate they pay. They will get more pay. CFA customers will pay more, I suppose.
Other chains have less motivated, less satisfied workers who will get that instant raise without any additional production or responsibilities. At a rate of $15/hr more people will be interested in the desultory fast food workers' jobs and, unless some laws of economics are repealed, competition will increase. Will the current marginal worker, the one who isn't motivated and productive lose in competition and make $0/hr instead of the current $8/hr or future $15/hr? Will the worker with tattoos lose to the clean cut newbie who knows how to show up on time? Why shouldn't employers hire and employ the best, most productive and motivated workers?
Brave new world that might not be so friendly.
When I talk to managers, the conversation almost always gets to the difficulty in hiring employees with the most basic skills and habits. Show up on time. Be courteous. Dress appropriately. Carry out simple tasks. Perform without supervision. Higher pay means more competition for the same work, which means some will lose. The marginal worker will lose the higher pay job and have to migrate to a lower minimum wage job not favored by gummit for an increase.
Guess they will work it out, or not work it out.
My stray thoughts on SBC stuff may be found at my blog,