Let's take the KJV as an example, Sandy:
There are 2 accounts of Creation in it (and all other translations) because there are simply 2 documents which do not agree in the order of creation / the name used for God. If God dictated it, then why are there 2 different stories? Does not God know his own name?
Take ! Corinthians 13 and "love is not easily provoked." The word "easily" is not in the original manuscript because the translators feared the temper of the King! If it were a "dictated text" (with many still claiming the KJV is "God's Word"), then you have a "perfect inerrant" problem!
What you are ignoring is the hand of man in the writing of the Bible / deciding by Church Council what would be included and what is excluded / the simple difference between hand copied manuscripts / the absence of any "original autograph."
What is the problem with simply saying, "The Bible is INSPIRED?"
By the way, this is not that germain to the topic we are discussing and should have its own place elsewhere.